ALROTECH CO. LTD vs. NII OTSI ATTA IV (SUB. BY NII AKRAMAH II) & 2 ORS
  • IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
    ACCRA - A.D 2016
ALROTECH CO. LTD - (Plaintiff/Respondent/Respondent/Applicant)
NII OTSI ATTA IV (SUB. BY NII AKRAMAH II) & 2 ORS - (Appellants/Applicants/Respondents)

DATE:  4TH JULY 2016
CIVIL APPEAL SUIT NO:  H3/227/16
JUDGES:  P. K GYAESAYOR JA (Presiding), IRENE LARBI (MRS) JA, A. LOVELACE-JOHNSON JA
LAWYERS:  MR.EMMANUEL OHENE FOR PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/APPLICANT
MR. ERIC OSEI MENSAH FOR APPELLANTS/APPLICANTS/RESPONDENTS
JUDGEMENT

 

GYAESAYOR, JA

The ruling sought to be varied is dated 26th January 2016. It stayed the execution of the judgment dated 14th April 2015 pending appeal. That judgment was delivered by Justice Abdullah Iddrisu. An application for stay of execution was refused by the judge on 31st July 2015. The reason being that there is no executable order made in the judgment.

 

All judgments and applications have been resolved in favour of the present applicant. The respondents have not appealed against the judgments delivered by Justice Abodakpi on 30th April 2013 and that delivered by Justice Ofori Atta on 2nd December 2008. Even now they cannot appeal in view of the time limits given for appeals by Rule 9 of C. I. 19.

 

Indeed at page 30 of the judgment apart from the order for the costs and damages, does not contain any executable orders. We find no exceptional circumstances warranting the grant of the stay.

 

The applicant who has been found to have lawfully acquired the land and gave out portion to third parties for development are under sustained pressure to deliver to them lands they had paid for. In our view the applicants on the balance of convenience stand to suffer most. Other orders made by Justice Iddrisu in the judgment only re-echo what the two previous judgments have already made and which have not been appealed. To us it is unfair that the applicant was being denied the benefits conferred by these judgments as well as other judgments. We are in favour of varying the order of the single judge by setting it aside since we find nothing wrong with the ruling of the court below refusing the application for stay. We with due respect set aside the order of the court dated 26th January 2016. For the avoidance of doubt the order of stay of execution granted by the single justice of this court, dated 26th January, 2016 is hereby set aside.

 

 

 

SGD

P. K. GYAESAYOR

(JUSTICE OF APPEAL)

 

SGD

LARBI, JA                                 I AGREE                  IRENE LARBI (MRS.)

                        (JUSTICE OF APPEAL)

 

SGD

LOVELACE-JOHNSON, JA     I ALSO AGREE      A.LOVELACE-JOHNSON

                                                                                     (JUSTICE OF APPEAL)