The burden of proving that an exhibit sent to the Central Authority of a foreign State or the competent authority of a foreign entity pursuant to a loan order made under section 66 (1), and returned to Ghana is not in the same condition as it was when the loan order was made or that it was tampered with after the loan order was made, is on the party who makes that allegation and in the absence of proof to the contrary, the exhibit shall be considered to have been in the continuous possession of the court that made the loan order.